Once again, Holly Ashcraft is under suspicion of infanticide.
A 21-year-old USC student charged with her baby's abandonment and death this week also was investigated last year after she arrived at a hospital in downtown Los Angeles appearing to have just given birth but without a baby, according to law enforcement sources close to the case.
Investigators never found the body in 2004.
In the current case, Ashcraft, of Billings, Mont., was arrested Wednesday and charged with murder and child abuse in connection with the alleged abandonment of her newborn son in a trash bin near her apartment north of the USC campus. Police said the child was born alive but placed inside a cardboard box and deposited into the container. A homeless man picking through the trash discovered the child and called police.
As Independent Sources points out, California has a "Safe Surrender" law, which would have allowed Ms. Ashcraft to take her baby to any site designated as a Safe Surrender site without fear of prosecution or arrest. (The law only applies to infants three days or younger, who have not been neglected or abused.)
Link: USC Student Was Focus of '04 Baby Investigation - Los Angeles Times.













What about the guy or guys that put her in this position?
There is not a single comment anywhere at all about finding out who they are and nailing their buts to the wall. Did they try to help her when she was pregnant??? Remember, this was no immaculate conception.
The guys who did this to her are the real vermin here.
Posted by: Norm O'Neill | Thursday, October 27, 2005 at 05:31 AM
While what they did was morally wrong, I have heard no hint that this was rape, so what would you charge him with?
As far as helping her, we don't even know if the guilty party knew that she was pregnant.
Posted by: PC | Saturday, October 29, 2005 at 10:33 PM
Ms.Ashcraft at 21 years old knows what she is doing, and she should be sentenced to life. She was the whore the slept with drunk men at parties and did this to her self I personally hope she rots in hell
Posted by: Crystal Urban of ct | Thursday, December 01, 2005 at 10:30 AM
It is incredibly presumputous of you to assume that Holly got pregnant by being a whore who slept with drunk men at parties. I think anyone who has ever had an unplanned pregnancy would take offense to your comments. What Holly did was wrong and she obviously made a horrible decision in disposing of her baby, but don't make assumptions as to how she got pregnant. That is incredibly ignorant. She will stand trail for what she did and her and unfortunately her family too will continue to pay for it the rest of their lives. But let the courts and God judge her. Who are you to judge? Again, your comments just show your ignorance.
Posted by: Fellow Billings West High Graduate | Monday, December 05, 2005 at 11:24 AM
Yes, to assume Holly was a whore and got pregnant from getting drunk and having sex is ignorant but was she sober when she commited her crime? As a mother at 19 I believe she had to have been on somthing unnatural to put her newborn baby in a box and leave it for dead.I did not expect or want a baby so young either but it happened and now I have her life to look forward to, holly on the other hand may never get to experiance such a miracle. I pray that Holly spends the rest of her life in prison so that those babies get some justice, such sins are just not meant to be forgivin.
Posted by: Young Mother in Billings, MT | Wednesday, December 28, 2005 at 02:09 PM
There is an unforgivable sin, but it is not murder.
"Repent ye, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ unto the remission of your sins." (Acts 2:38)
None of us are worthy of forgiveness, and yet we can be forgiven.
Posted by: P. Campbell | Wednesday, December 28, 2005 at 06:29 PM
i knew holly as a classmate and colleague - she was no druggie or whore. for anyone to assume such things and pray that she be imprisoned or rot in hell shows his or her narrow-mindedness. reconsider passing judgment on someone you never knew, except through the media's inaccurate portrayal. this crime should raise questions and awareness that could actively change the way we deal with unwanted pregnancies; not create vicious attacks and further ignorance. I do not agree with the way her pregnancy was handled, and no one knows what she was thinking or going through, I will not pass judgments on something that I do not fully understand, I hope others can be mature and objective when considering such cases.
Posted by: student | Monday, January 09, 2006 at 05:38 PM
Student, How do you suggest we deal with unwanted pregnancies?
Posted by: young mother in billings MT | Wednesday, January 25, 2006 at 11:32 AM
I think what this young woman did was absolutly discusting, immoral and completly wrong, how could any one do that to their own children? obivously there is something severley wrong with this creature. absolutly makes me sick. when I heard this I was immediatly nauseated think about thoes poor innocent babies that had no choice they were going to be mothered by an ANIMAL! she should be sentenced to life in prison with no paroll.
Posted by: student also from her high school | Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 11:16 PM
hello woman,its call foster care not have yr baby then killing it whats wrong with u?!?!?!?r u retarded or something if i had 2 kids i would love them not kill them!if u don't want kids then don't go running around with guys and getting busy with it duh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Posted by: kelsey | Sunday, May 07, 2006 at 03:50 PM
I think we should execute her. Why argue about it?
Posted by: Leroy | Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 12:44 PM
I think she should be in jail her whole life or they should just execute her. It's not fair for that little baby boy that could've had a life with a loving family. That woman disgusts me!
Posted by: Valerie | Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 02:21 PM
Whether her baby was stillborn or alive. She still "got rid of him". How could she. A well educated woman knows better. No matter what her situation was, she had no right. The courts will deal with her and she will live with her actions for the rest of her life (preferablly in jail).
Posted by: Liz K. | Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 10:25 PM
As a father of a newborn, it brings tears to my eyes to think about the baby involved. That poor baby who starved to death and was frightened beyond imagination. Coming into this world is scary enough for a baby and to add the neglect and pain on top of it that was caused by his mother is just heart-wrenching. Perhaps most of us don't know Holly as former classmates, etc. And perhaps we don't know how she got pregnant. But that is irrelevant. The point is -- she gave birth to a baby and that baby ended up dead in a box that was taped shut. That doesn't happen by accident. Whether she got pregnant by mistake or intentionally, people who become parents take on a responsibility to that child whether they like it or not. What she did is disgraceful and she deserves a like punishment. Hopefully she will be taped shut inside a box as well (her prison cell).
Posted by: Anonymous | Monday, November 27, 2006 at 04:43 PM
Wow, Norm. Way to take the perp and make her the victim. Perhaps if they were able to find those whose "buts" (sic) you feel should have been nailed to the wall, we may have a found a willing father who, by the way, had NO culpability in how the baby was disposed. What would you say if she had given birth and the father had just taken the baby and dumped it in a trash bin? That the mother should be held responsible? Your logic reflects your ineptitude. Keep to trolling the Yahoo Message Boards. Idiot.
Posted by: Mark Dalton | Wednesday, January 10, 2007 at 02:06 PM
She was simply to cheap to pay for an abortion and really...infanticide is a natural conclusion to legalized abortion all the way up to the nineth month as we have in this country.
If Dr. George Tiller can do it, why not she?
I mean really...why should abortionists be the only ones allowed to kill babies.
And even Senator Barbara Boxer would not call the baby 'BORN' if at least the big toe was still in the birth canal...so she could have finished the baby while the toe was still inside her.
It was a simple late term abortion.
She should be charged with practicing medicine with out a lisence....not murder.
Killing newborns is legal in the US...as long as the toe is still inside.
mollie mi
Posted by: mollie | Wednesday, June 13, 2007 at 06:22 PM
How could anyone possibly defend this low-life bimbo. This scumbag gets knocked up and kills her first child (stillbirth my buttcrack!!!), then does the same thing again! There is nothing else to know about this horrible person!! ZERO EXCUSE FOR WHAT SHE DID!!!! NONE!!! She tosses away one baby and a few months later is pregnant again? It is called BIRTH CONTROL! Or how about this, IF YOU DON'T WANT TO BE PREGNANT KEEP YOUR FRIGGIN' LEGS TOGETHER!She needs to be spayed like the dog she is, problem solved. Then throw her away in a cell like the trash she is. If you live in a state with Safe Surrender laws and you still do this to your child you do not deserve to live, it is worse than murder when you kill TWO children so you can continue on with your pathetic lifestyle. Anyone with half a brain knows this is why she tried to just erase the lives of these children. The very idea that she wasn't prosecuted the first time is disgusting. If she couldn't produce a body for autopsy to prove the baby was stillborn then she should have been lock up until she remembered where she hid the body!
Posted by: Holly | Wednesday, June 13, 2007 at 07:57 PM
since when not havin evidence of a body not reason to charge anyone??? she said she had a stillborn, but didnt say what happened to it?? this is disgustin in the fact that she had one baby throws that one away and yet has another and kills that one too? come on now, it blows my mind that no one pressed her where the child was or what happened and she was just allowed to walk freely away, it doesnt make any sense at all
Posted by: lita | Tuesday, August 21, 2007 at 09:12 AM
Wow Thats just dumb, Maybe she didnt tell them its not the dudes fault she was a hoe, its her own fault she opened her legs and didnt have birth control. there is also a thing called the morning after pill, she had plenty of options other than murdering a newborn child (rather 2 Newborn children)
I have 3 children whom i cant stand being away from for more than 1 hour. my first of which i had at 19 yea i had to put my life on hold thats what happens when u open up your legs and dont use birth control. Stupid bitch deserves whatever punishment she gets.
Posted by: Mandy | Friday, September 21, 2007 at 02:50 PM